Thursday 29 September 2011

The Art of Russia - Andrew Graham-Dixon (2010)

I've spent the past three nights watching a BBC series on Russian Art. It was mind-blowing. I've become obsessed Russia and its art, so badly I want to go there even more than I wanted to go before. 


The series starts with the question about how to get to know Russia and its people and the answer being, through their art. So from early pagan representations it moves to the conversion to Christianism and its meaning in the idea of being Russian, to how the tsars used Art and how they spent money in it. The same art that help the nation together also started the revolutions. 

I've heard of Russian religious icons and Andrej Rublev but I haven't heard of The Wanderers Wow. 




One of the best thing about the series is how he explains art both passionately and thoroughly yet in a very simple and non-pretentious way.  He doesn't just take into account the technique or the beauty of it but the social context in which it was produced and what it means for its time. That's how Art shows should be made!

When he gets to the Revolution he also talks about films and the role of Art for the Party. And Eisenstein, of course. I'm a little disappointed he doesn't mention Dziga Vertov, just because of how creative, comitted and bold he was with his experiments.Shame he also talks very little about Kandinski.

The Constructivists' work was so interesting to discover and still so modern! He goes into a museum, well a back room inside an office where they keep some original material from Rodchenko-Maiakovski and he very excitedly says something that is true, how they were pioneers in advertising. The best works aren't online (because they are in those drawers).

Finally. How beautiful is Moscow's Metro! (and how unfair are the pictures on the internet) The money Stalin invested in making them revolutionary propaganda surely turned them into museums!


How do you end such an impressive series? Well he manages to take us to contemporary Russian art: confused, disenchanted, bleak... he really captures the spirit. So many centuries in only three hours are quite difficult to take in, so you can imagine living with such a heritage must be even more difficult.

Monday 26 September 2011

Kes - Ken Loach (1969)

My first thought was "Why haven't I seen this before?". Such a simple charming film, and nicely done too.



I was expecting a movie about miners and growing up... and I found the British 400 Blows. I like it when that happens to you, when a film is so touching you can't stop thinking about it for days. If it refuses to leave you then it's done something ♥

The characters were completely engaging. When non-professional actors do it so well you hardly notice they are acting it's even better than when you find a good actor. It's only a great director that makes it look as if it was simple.

I also liked the camera and editing... it flows so naturally, not intrusive at all or forced in any way. 

My favourite scene was the one where he talks in class about his kestrel. It's such a wonderful moment of being listened to for the first time. Discovering he has a voice. It beats the caning scene where you can see the pain in the little one's eyes.

Even though I knew for most of the film what was going to happen at the end it was nice seeing how the film got in and out of that moment.

The original trailer



This was interesting too



Kes

The Genesis

My film obsession started in my mid teens. If I had known at the time, it would have saved my soul. Instead I discovered people worked in films and I knew I wanted to do that. I'm glad that happened, I could have turned into a film critic and nothing would have saved my soul then. 

I had/have a love/hate relationship with films. I go through periods were I am eager to watch anything and everything. So I do. But my brain collapses once in a while and I go through periods of healthy film abstinence.

This blog started in a new period of film hunger. After a film festival I decided it was time to catch up. And I started with The Magnificent Amberson, which I enjoyed. And then Kes came into my life, which will be my first proper entry. 

I need to keep track of the films I watch and the ideas they bring to me. It will also help me go back to my self-studying of films.  


There will be lots of randomness and what people call "spoilers".